I feel I owe the dwindling band of loyal readers of this blog, exquisitely described by one fan as ‘libellous, inaccurate bollocks’ and ‘paranoid tosh’, an explanation for recent inactivity. The truth is that I’ve been on retreat, attending the biannual International Cornish Studies Conference at
Porthemmet.
 |
| Porthemmet Conference Centre |
Huge and enthusiastic crowd for the keynote paper on ‘Gone missing: did a voiceless alveolar lateral fricative exist in medieval Cornish?’ Fascinating. I escape the assembled obsessive-compulsives for a brief moment. Shall I be tempted by the contribution from VisitCornwall entitled ‘The fifth horseman of the apocalypse: why a tourist tax in Cornwall would mean the end of civilisation as we know it’? No, I’ll give it a miss and get some fresh air.
While taking a stroll along the strand, my mind idly turns to the questions that are never asked, either in the rarefied atmospheric mists of intellectual irrelevance that shroud Porthemmet, or in the everyday world of churnalism where exploited wordsmiths toil ceaselessly day and night to keep us completely confused and distracted.
 |
| Professor Tresoddit about to lecture on 'Foreshore or foreskin? Duchy discourses of the 1850s' |
Questions such as
What is Cornwall Council for?
Local government has always had two functions. On the one hand it’s an agent of the central state; on the other it represents localities to the centre. When the latter threatens to get out of hand, the state has, if it can get away with it, never hesitated to abolish local government. Such as in the 1980s when the GLC and Metropolitan Counties were axed. But this merely continued a fine old British tradition. For example, in the early 1800s democratic open parish vestries were replaced by ‘select’ vestries, chosen only by the richer ratepayers.
In this light the abolition of a whole tier of Cornish local government in 2009 and its replacement by a unitary Cornwall Council was nothing new. The more local a council is the more susceptible it is to popular influence and the popular will. So much easier to distance government from the people by getting rid of the most potentially responsive level of local government and ensuring a popular mandate is only needed once every four years rather than two.
Easier that is for central government, left to deal with only one institution rather than seven. Easier as well for bureaucratic cadres at County Hall who could enhance their power. And easier too for the local political clique, Tory, Independent and Lib Dem, who like to think they run things and luxuriate in the glow of their own pompous self-importance.
For these groups emasculating local government and halving the number of elections in Cornwall at a stroke was completely logical. A more remote and centralized Cornwall Council with weakened popular oversight plays very nicely indeed into their hands, tidying up lines of decision-making and deepening the democratic deficit.
Others also benefit. One council enables more effective lobbying from well-funded and organised business interests. Land speculators and house-builders, keenly aware of the profits to be made from selling a Cornish lifestyle, cluster around the new authority like bees to nectar (or should that be like flies to shit).
The housebuilding lobby adopts a two-pronged strategy. The large construction companies have
successfully lobbied the Tory/Lib Dem Government to give the green light to any and every large ‘development’. At the same time they press local government in Cornwall to build as many houses as possible, bribing them with sports stadia, new schools, roads, supermarkets, public open spaces or whatever.
Captured by the profiteers, Cornwall Council attaches itself ever more blatantly to a mindless ‘growth’ agenda. Abandoning any pretence of even-handedly trying to control the tiger of speculative hyper-development it jumps on its back and becomes a leading player in the great sale of Cornwall. It now acts more as a conduit for funnelling public funds to SERCO, SITA, other global corporations, and a host of up-country consultants, than as a representative of local communities.
Its role is to drive through ‘development’ at any cost, manipulating opinion and controlling public discourse in the process. Space for democratic debate shrinks. Internally too, the Cabinet system centralizes control. Councillors are effectively neutered. Those few councillors unhappy at being a mere cipher and with the initiative or ability to question things are efficiently co-opted, contained or marginalised.
A tiny mandarin class and a political elite – it’s difficult to know which is in the driving seat – sits in the centre of the spider’s web. All potential predators are safely muzzled, the fourth estate feeble and ineffective, voters and councillors alike kept at a safe distance. A Stalinist climate of fear and suspicion descends. The result is a one-party state that lacks even the redeeming feature of a party. Politics is diminished. Alienation is rife, the people disillusioned and disheartened.
Politics in Cornwall were changed fundamentally by the coup of the mandarin elite back in 2008/09. We have still to wake up to its implications. As I sleeplessly wander the plush corridors of the Porthemmet Conference Centre I shall ponder the next obvious question.
What is to be done?
 |
| Conference delegates relax at the bar |